91视频

Under de senaste decennierna har detta omr氓de utvecklats till ett tv盲rvetenskapligt och internationellt forskningsf盲lt i sk盲rningspunkten mellan juridik och kulturvetenskap. Det 盲r h盲r min egen forskning 氓terfinns. Jag har fokuserat p氓 vikten av att studera samtida globaliserings- och digitaliseringsprocesser g盲llande kontroll av information, kultur och kunskap genom en historiskt f枚rankrad analys.

Efter b枚ckerna No Trespassing (2004) och Terms of Use (2008) har jag i min senaste bok Making Marie Curie: Intellectual Property and Celebrity Culture in an Age of Information (Chicago University Press, 2015) angripit fr氓gan om vetenskapens 枚ppenhetsideal genom att f枚lja hur personen Marie Curie blev personan 鈥滿arie Curie鈥� i sin karri盲r som vetenskaplig celebritet.

Mina framtida forskningsplaner inneb盲r att i allt h枚gre grad 盲gna mig 氓t immaterialr盲ttens inverkan p氓 forskning och vetenskap samt i samband med detta utveckla en forskningsplattform om vetenskapens kulturella mediering och medialisering. Mitt n盲sta bokprojekt kommer att handla om patenteringens offentlighet.

Patents as Scientific Information, 1895鈥�2020 (PASSIM)

V氓ren 2017 tilldelades jag 鈥� som f枚rsta svenska kvinna inom humaniora och samh盲llsvetenskap 鈥� ett Advanced Grant fr氓n European Research Council (ERC) f枚r projektet 鈥淧atents as Scientific Information, 1895鈥�2020 (PASSIM). Projektet startar 1 september 2017 och l枚per mellan 2017鈥�2022. Se kort beskrivning nedan.聽

鈥淗istory will remember Barack Obama as the great Slayer of Patent Trolls.鈥� The headline from the 2014 March 20 issue of Wired credits POTUS with, perhaps, an unexpected feat. Referring to companies in the sole business of enforcing patents beyond their actual value, trolls are a recent installment in the history of an intellectual property whose ubiquitousness the Latin word PASSIM (鈥渉ere and there, everywhere鈥�) neatly captures. In the eye of the storm stands the patent bargain: disclosure of information in return for a limited monopoly. This contractual moment makes patents a source of information, the basis of new innovation. Or does it? By posing this simple question, PASSIM鈥檚 bold take on the legitimacy of intellectual property in the governance of informational resources follow patents as legal and informational documents during three historical 鈥減atent phases,鈥� producing a visionary and theoretically savvy interpretation of intellectual property that stems from its humanities-based and interdisciplinary project design. PASSIM shows a way out of current analytical gridlocks that earmark the understanding of the role of intellectual property in infrastructures 鈥� most notably the enclosure/openness dichotomy 鈥� and provides a fresh take on the complexity of informational processes. A key steppingstone in the PI鈥檚 career, her own contribution to PASSIM will be a work of synthesis, highlighting major tendencies in the history of patents as scientific information from 1895 to the present. Four complementary empirical studies target specific themes that strengthen PASSIM鈥檚 validity and impact: questions of copyrights in patents, scientists鈥� patenting strategies both historically and today, the relationship between bibliometrics and patentometrics, and the status of the patent as a legal and informational document. Outputs include workshops, articles, monographs, policy papers and documentation of the project鈥檚 experiences with interdisciplinary self-reflexivity.